The Origin of the Pre-Ossetic Oblique Case Suffix and Its Implications
University of Pennsylvania
In this paper I propose a new derivation for the Ossetic genitive/
locative nominal suffix (Iron -y, Digor -i, Old Oss. (Zelenchuk) -i).
Until now, scholars have sought to explain much of the Ossetic system
of nominal suffixes as directly reflecting a number of Old Iranian
case endings, e.g. gen.-loc. -y/-i < consonant-stem gen. sg. *-ah and
loc. sg. *-ya:, abl. -aei < a:-stem gen.-abl. sg. *-aya:h (cf. most
recently Bielmeier 1982:66-7, Thordarsson 1989:459, 470-1). Recently,
Testen (1996:371) has cast some doubt on this longstanding practice,
proposing instead that Ossetic passed through an intermediate stage of
development in which the OIran. system of inflection had been reduced
to a contrast between direct (with no ending) and oblique (with
ending -i), as preserved in Yaghnobi.
Following Sims-Williams's (1982) explanation of the Sogdian "oblique"
suffix -i of heavy-stem nominals as the phonologically regular outcome
of unstressed fem. gen.-abl. sg. *-aya:h and masc./fem. loc. sg.
*-aya:, I suggest that a similar development may account for Proto-
Oss. *-i, via syncope of the medial *-a- and subsequent change of
*ya > *i, as in the definite article and the Oss. equivalent of the
This scenario implies that the accentual system of pre-Ossetic may
have undergone a shift similar to the Rhythmic Law of Sogdian,
by which the first syllable containing a "strong" vowel was accented
and words consisting only of "weak" vowels received final stress.
Such a rule would have clear historical consequences for phenomena
such as vowel affection, syncope, and the alternation of a and ae.
In addition, the origin of Oss. -y/-i, along with the well-known
collective pl. suffix -tae < *-ta:, provides another significant
shared morphological innovation with Sogdian (and Yaghnobi). These
and other potential isoglosses should lead to a clearer picture of
the prehistoric relation of Ossetic to other Middle and Modern East
Iranian languages and the internal affiliations of East Iranian in
(Note: ae = ash, V: = long V.)
Bielmeier, Roland. 1982. Zur Entwicklung der ossetischen Deklinanation. IF 87, 58-69.
Sims-Williams, Nicholas. 1982. The double system of nominal inflexion in Sogdian. TPS 80, 67-76.
Testen, David. 1996. On the development of the clitic pronominals
in Ossetian. NSL.8: Linguistic Studies in the Non-Slavic
Languages of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the
Baltic Republics, ed. by Howard I. Aronson, 359-74. Chicago:
Chicago Linguistic Society.
Thordarson, Fridrik. 1989. Ossetic. Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, ed. by Ru"diger Schmitt, 456-79. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
< Back to List of Abstracts |
Back to PLC23 Home Page >
About the PLC23 Committee
Previously held Penn Linguistics Colloquium: PLC22 (1998), PLC21 (1997)
Penn Department of Linguistics
University of Pennsylvania